bradykinin fragment 2-9

Collect

BASIC PARAMETERS Find an error

CAS: 16875-11-9
MF: C44H61N11O10
MW: 904.02284
Synonyms: bradykinin fragment 2-9

REPORT BY

Jun Zhang

Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
follow

Zheng Ouyang

Purdue University
follow

Yu Xia

Purdue University
follow
Co-reporter: He Wang, Zheng Ouyang and Yu Xia
pp: 6534
Publication Date(Web):July 7, 2010
DOI: 10.1021/ac100872x
Electrospray ionization (ESI) is considered a soft ionization method, and typically no peptide ion fragmentation is observed. Recently, it has been observed that intensive fragmentation of peptide ions can occur during nanoelectrospray (nanoESI) at special conditions, such as solutions containing high concentrations of salt and relatively low voltage for the spray. In this study, peptide fragmentation during nanoESI has been systematically characterized. The fragmentation phenomenon was observed for a variety of peptides with molecular weights lower than 3000 Da and the types of fragments include a, b, and y ions. For phosphorylated peptides, very little loss of the labile phosphate groups was observed. Solution electrical conductivity (K) and flow rate were identified as the key parameters affecting the degree of peptide fragmentation. Mechanistic studies suggested that very fine first generation charged droplets (∼30 nm in diameter) with high surface electric field (∼1 V/nm) could be formed from nanoESI of highly conductive solutions (K = 0.4 S/m) and at a low flow rate (2 nL/min). It is proposed that solvated peptide ions are ejected with high kinetic energies from the early generations of charged droplets, and the subsequent collisional activation in air induces the peptide fragmentation. The relatively high degree of solvation around the phosphate groups may contribute to the preservation of the phosphorylation during the activation process.

Kristina Hakansson

University of Michigan
follow

Gary L. Glish

University of North Carolina
follow

James P. Reilly

Indiana University
follow

Ronald D. Macfarlane

Texas A&M University niversity
follow

David H. Russell

Texas A&M University
follow

Catherine C. Fenselau

University of Maryland
follow

Alan G. Marshall

Florida State University
follow