The reduction of substrates catalyzed by nitrogenase utilizes an electron transfer (ET) chain comprised of three metalloclusters distributed between the two component proteins, designated as the Fe protein and the MoFe protein. The flow of electrons through these three metalloclusters involves ET from the [4Fe-4S] cluster located within the Fe protein to an [8Fe-7S] cluster, called the P cluster, located within the MoFe protein and ET from the P cluster to the active site [7Fe-9S-X-Mo-homocitrate] cluster called FeMo-cofactor, also located within the MoFe protein. The order of these two electron transfer events, the relevant oxidation states of the P-cluster, and the role(s) of ATP, which is obligatory for ET, remain unknown. In the present work, the electron transfer process was examined by stopped-flow spectrophotometry using the wild-type MoFe protein and two variant MoFe proteins, one having the β-188Ser residue substituted by cysteine and the other having the β-153Cys residue deleted. The data support a “deficit-spending” model of electron transfer where the first event (rate constant 168 s–1) is ET from the P cluster to FeMo-cofactor and the second, “backfill”, event is fast ET (rate constant >1700 s–1) from the Fe protein [4Fe-4S] cluster to the oxidized P cluster. Changes in osmotic pressure reveal that the first electron transfer is conformationally gated, whereas the second is not. The data for the β-153Cys deletion MoFe protein variant provide an argument against an alternative two-step “hopping” ET model that reverses the two ET steps, with the Fe protein first transferring an electron to the P cluster, which in turn transfers an electron to FeMo-cofactor. The roles for ATP binding and hydrolysis in controlling the ET reactions were examined using βγ-methylene-ATP as a prehydrolysis ATP analogue and ADP + AlF4– as a posthydrolysis analogue (a mimic of ADP + Pi).

The reduction of substrates catalyzed by nitrogenase utilizes an electron transfer (ET) chain comprised of three metalloclusters distributed between the two component proteins, designated as the Fe protein and the MoFe protein. The flow of electrons through these three metalloclusters involves ET from the [4Fe-4S] cluster located within the Fe protein to an [8Fe-7S] cluster, called the P cluster, located within the MoFe protein and ET from the P cluster to the active site [7Fe-9S-X-Mo-homocitrate] cluster called FeMo-cofactor, also located within the MoFe protein. The order of these two electron transfer events, the relevant oxidation states of the P-cluster, and the role(s) of ATP, which is obligatory for ET, remain unknown. In the present work, the electron transfer process was examined by stopped-flow spectrophotometry using the wild-type MoFe protein and two variant MoFe proteins, one having the β-188Ser residue substituted by cysteine and the other having the β-153Cys residue deleted. The data support a “deficit-spending” model of electron transfer where the first event (rate constant 168 s–1) is ET from the P cluster to FeMo-cofactor and the second, “backfill”, event is fast ET (rate constant >1700 s–1) from the Fe protein [4Fe-4S] cluster to the oxidized P cluster. Changes in osmotic pressure reveal that the first electron transfer is conformationally gated, whereas the second is not. The data for the β-153Cys deletion MoFe protein variant provide an argument against an alternative two-step “hopping” ET model that reverses the two ET steps, with the Fe protein first transferring an electron to the P cluster, which in turn transfers an electron to FeMo-cofactor. The roles for ATP binding and hydrolysis in controlling the ET reactions were examined using βγ-methylene-ATP as a prehydrolysis ATP analogue and ADP + AlF4– as a posthydrolysis analogue (a mimic of ADP + Pi).

The TK2285 protein from Thermococcus kodakarensis was recently characterized as an enzyme catalyzing the phosphorylation of myo-inositol. Only two myo-inositol kinases have been identified so far, the TK2285 protein and Lpa3 from Zea mays, both of which belong to the ribokinase family. In either case, which of the six hydroxyl groups of myo-inositol is phosphorylated is still unknown. In addition, little is known about the myo-inositol binding mechanism of these enzymes. In this work, we determined two crystal structures: those of the TK2285 protein complexed with the substrates (ATP analogue and myo-inositol) or the reaction products formed by the enzyme. Analysis of the ternary substrates-complex structure and site-directed mutagenesis showed that five residues were involved in the interaction with myo-inositol. Structural comparison with other ribokinase family enzymes indicated that two of the five residues, Q136 and R140, are characteristic of myo-inositol kinase. The crystal structure of the ternary products-complex, which was prepared by incubating the TK2285 protein with myo-inositol and ATP, holds 1d-myo-inositol 3-phosphate (Ins(3)P) in the active site. NMR and HPLC analyses with a chiral column also indicated that the TK2285 reaction product was Ins(3)P. The results obtained here showed that the TK2285 protein specifically catalyzes the phosphorylation of the 3-OH of myo-inositol. We thus designated TK2285 as myo-inositol 3-kinase (MI3K). The precise identification of the reaction product should provide a sound basis to further explore inositol metabolism in Archaea.