Co-reporter: Kene N. Piasta, Caleb J. Ulliman, Peter F. Slivka, Brian R. Crane, and Joseph J. Falke
pp:
Publication Date(Web):May 13, 2013
DOI: 10.1021/bi400385c
The three core components of the ubiquitous bacterial chemosensory array — the transmembrane chemoreceptor, the histidine kinase CheA, and the adaptor protein CheW — assemble to form a membrane-bound, hexagonal lattice in which receptor transmembrane signals regulate kinase activity. Both the regulatory domain of the kinase and the adaptor protein bind to overlapping sites on the cytoplasmic tip of the receptor (termed the protein interaction region). Notably, the kinase regulatory domain and the adaptor protein share the same fold constructed of two SH3-like domains. The present study focuses on the structural interface between the receptor and the kinase regulatory domain. Two models have been proposed for this interface: Model 1 is based on the crystal structure of a homologous Thermotoga complex between a receptor fragment and the CheW adaptor protein. This model has been used in current models of chemosensory array architecture to build the receptor–CheA kinase interface. Model 2 is based on a newly determined crystal structure of a homologous Thermotoga complex between a receptor fragment and the CheA kinase regulatory domain. Both models present unique strengths and weaknesses, and current evidence is unable to resolve which model best describes contacts in the native chemosensory arrays of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and other bacteria. Here we employ disulfide mapping and tryptophan and alanine mutation to identify docking sites (TAM-IDS) to test Models 1 and 2 in well-characterized membrane-bound arrays formed from E. coli and S. typhimurium components. The results reveal that the native array interface between the receptor protein interaction region and the kinase regulatory domain is accurately described by Model 2, but not by Model 1. In addition, the results show that the interface possesses both a structural function that contributes to stable CheA kinase binding in the array and a regulatory function central to transmission of the activation signal from receptor to CheA kinase. On–off switching alters the disulfide formation rates of specific Cys pairs at the interface, but not most Cys pairs, indicating that signaling perturbs localized regions of the interface. The findings suggest a simple model for the rearrangement of the interface triggered by the attractant signal and for longer range transmission of the signal in the chemosensory array.
Co-reporter: Andrew M. Natale, Jane L. Duplantis, Kene N. Piasta, and Joseph J. Falke
pp:
Publication Date(Web):October 3, 2013
DOI: 10.1021/bi401159k
The ultrasensitive, ultrastable bacterial chemosensory array of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is representative of the large, conserved family of sensory arrays that control the cellular chemotaxis of motile bacteria and Archaea. The core framework of the membrane-bound array is a lattice assembled from three components: a transmembrane receptor, a cytoplasmic His kinase (CheA), and a cytoplasmic adaptor protein (CheW). Structural studies in the field have revealed the global architecture of the array and complexes between specific components, but much remains to be learned about the essential protein–protein interfaces that define array structure and transmit signals between components. This study has focused on the structure, function, and on–off switching of a key contact between the kinase and adaptor proteins in the working, membrane-bound array. Specifically, the study addressed interface 1 in the putative kinase–adaptor ring where subdomain 1 of the kinase regulatory domain contacts subdomain 2 of the adaptor protein. Two independent approaches, disulfide mapping and site-directed Trp and Ala mutagenesis, were employed (i) to test the structural model of interface 1 and (ii) to investigate its functional roles in both stable kinase incorporation and receptor-regulated kinase on–off switching. Studies were conducted in functional, membrane-bound arrays or in live cells. The findings reveal that crystal structures of binary and ternary complexes accurately depict the native interface in its kinase-activating on state. Furthermore, the findings indicate that at least part of the interface becomes less closely packed in its kinase-inhibiting off state. Together, the evidence shows the interface has a dual structural and signaling function that is crucial for incorporation of the stable kinase into the array, for kinase activation in the array on state, and likely for attractant-triggered kinase on–off switching. A model is presented that describes the concerted transmission of a conformational signal among the receptor, the kinase regulatory domain, and the adaptor protein. In principle, this signal could spread out into the surrounding array via the kinase–adaptor ring, employing a series of alternating frozen–dynamic transitions that transmit low-energy attractant signals long distances.