TATA binding protein (TBP) is a key component of the eukaryotic RNA polymerase II transcription machinery that binds to TATA boxes located in the core promoter regions of many genes. Structural and biochemical studies have shown that when TBP binds DNA, it sharply bends the DNA. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to study DNA bending by human TBP on consensus and mutant TATA boxes in the absence and presence of TFIIA. We found that the state of the bent DNA within populations of TBP–DNA complexes is homogeneous; partially bent intermediates were not observed. In contrast to the results of previous ensemble studies, TBP was found to bend a mutant TATA box to the same extent as the consensus TATA box. Moreover, in the presence of TFIIA, the extent of DNA bending was not significantly changed, although TFIIA did increase the fraction of DNA molecules bound by TBP. Analysis of the kinetics of DNA bending and unbending revealed that on the consensus TATA box two kinetically distinct populations of TBP–DNA complexes exist; however, the bent state of the DNA is the same in the two populations. Our smFRET studies reveal that human TBP bends DNA in a largely uniform manner under a variety of different conditions, which was unexpected given previous ensemble biochemical studies. Our new observations led to us to revise the model for the mechanism of DNA binding by TBP and for how DNA bending is affected by TATA sequence and TFIIA.

A report of the Keystone Symposium on Dynamics of Eukaryotic Transcription during Development, Big Sky, Montana, USA, 7-12 April 2010.

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are now recognized as transregulators of eukaryotic transcription, a role once attributed exclusively to protein factors. Two ncRNAs in mammalian cells have been shown to repress general mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in response to heat shock: mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA. B2 and Alu RNAs bind directly and tightly to Pol II and co-occupy the promoters of repressed genes along with the polymerase. Here, we identified the molecular mechanism by which mouse B2 RNA and human Alu RNA repress Pol II transcription. Biochemical assays to probe the network of protein–DNA interactions at the promoter revealed that B2 and Alu RNAs prevent Pol II from establishing contacts with the promoter both upstream and downstream of the TATA box during closed complex formation. Disruption of these contacts correlates with transcriptional repression. We conclude that B2 and Alu RNA prevent Pol II from properly engaging the DNA during closed complex formation, resulting in complexes with an altered conformation that are transcriptionally inert. In the absence of its normal contacts with the promoter, Pol II is likely held in these inactive complexes on DNA through interactions with promoter-bound TATA box-binding protein and transcription factor IIB.

Many methods commonly used to identify and characterize interactions between two or more proteins are variations of the immobilized protein-protein interaction assay (for example, glutathione S-transferase (GST) pulldown and coimmunoprecipitation). A potential, and often overlooked, problem with these assays is the possibility that an observed interaction is mediated not by direct contact between proteins, but instead by nucleic acid contaminating the protein preparations.

B2 RNA is a small noncoding RNA polymerase III transcript that represses mRNA transcription in response to heat shock in mouse cells. Here we define the mechanism by which B2 RNA inhibits RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcription. Using a purified Pol II transcription system, we found that B2 RNA potently inhibits transcription by binding to core Pol II with high affinity and specificity. Through this interaction, B2 RNA assembles into preinitiation complexes at the promoter and blocks RNA synthesis. Once B2 RNA is removed from preinitiation complexes, transcriptional activity is restored. Our studies describe a previously unobserved mechanism of transcriptional repression by a small RNA and suggest that B2 RNA associates with Pol II at promoters in heat shocked cells to actively inhibit transcription.

•Only a single NFAT element at −45 is essential for transcriptional synergy by NFATc2 and cJun.•IL-2 transcriptional synergy is sensitive to the helical phasing between the −45 NFAT element and the transcriptional start site.•NFATc2 can recruit cJun to the −45 NFAT site in the absence of an AP-1 site.•The bZip domain of cJun is sufficient to interact with the C-terminal activation domain of NFATc2 and this interaction is blocked by AP-1 DNA.•An AP-1 DNA element can replace the −45 NFAT site to mediate transcriptional synergy.Transcription of interleukin-2 (IL-2), a pivotal cytokine in the mammalian immune response, is induced by NFAT and AP-1 transcriptional activators in stimulated T cells. NFATc2 and cJun drive high levels of synergistic human IL-2 transcription, which requires a unique interaction between the C-terminal activation domain of NFATc2 and cJun homodimers. Here we studied the mechanism by which this interaction contributes to synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription. We found that NFATc2 can recruit cJun homodimers to the −45 NFAT element, which lacks a neighboring AP-1 site. The bZip domain of cJun is sufficient to interact with the C-terminal activation domain of NFATc2 in the absence of DNA and this interaction is inhibited by AP-1 DNA. When the −45 NFAT site was replaced by either an NFAT/AP-1 composite site or a single AP-1 site the specificity for cJun homodimers in synergistically activating IL-2 transcription was lost, and cJun/cFos heterodimers strongly activated transcription. These studies support a model in which IL-2 transcriptional synergy is mediated by the unique recruitment of a cJun homodimer to the −45 NFAT site by NFATc2, where it acts as a co-activator for IL-2 transcription.

At eukaryotic promoters, multi-faceted protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions can result in synergistic transcriptional activation. NFAT and AP-1 proteins induce interleukin-2 (IL-2) transcription in stimulated T cells, but the contributions of individual members of these activator families to synergistically activating IL-2 transcription is not known. To investigate the combinatorial regulation of IL-2 transcription we tested the ability of different combinations of NFATc2, NFATc1, cJun, and cFos to synergistically activate transcription from the IL-2 promoter. We found that NFATc2 and cJun are exclusive in their ability to synergistically activate human IL-2 transcription. Protein–protein interaction assays revealed that in the absence of DNA, NFATc2, but not NFATc1, bound directly to cJun/cJun dimers, but not to cFos/cJun heterodimers. A region of NFATc2 C-terminal of the DNA binding domain was necessary and sufficient for interaction with cJun in the absence of DNA, and this same region of NFATc2 was required for the synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription in T cells. Moreover, expression of this C-terminal region of NFATc2 specifically repressed the synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription. These studies show that a previously unidentified interaction between human NFATc2 and cJun is necessary for synergistic activation of IL-2 transcription in T cells.

Mammalian short interspersed elements (SINEs) are abundant retrotransposons that have long been considered junk DNA; however, RNAs transcribed from mouse B2 and human Alu SINEs have recently been found to control mRNA production at multiple levels. Upon cell stress B2 and Alu RNAs bind RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and repress transcription of some protein-encoding genes. Bi-directional transcription of a B2 SINE establishes a boundary that places the growth hormone locus in a permissive chromatin state during mouse development. Alu RNAs embedded in Pol II transcripts can promote evolution and proteome diversity through exonization via alternative splicing. Given the diverse means by which SINE encoded RNAs impact production of mRNAs, this genomic junk is proving to contain hidden gems.

The cytokine interleukin-2 (IL-2) is produced by T cells when they recognize a foreign antigen. Transcription of the IL-2 gene is tightly controlled by the combined actions of multiple transcriptional activators. However, the contribution of sequences in the IL-2 core promoter and the architecture of the IL-2 regulatory region to setting levels of IL-2 transcription are not understood. We have probed these properties of the human IL-2 promoter to understand how the regulatory and core promoter regions cooperate in response to T cell stimulation, thereby setting high levels of inducible transcription. We found that the IL-2 core promoter contains a TATA box that is critical for inducible expression. Moreover, the spacing and orientation between the IL-2 regulatory and core promoter regions is important for setting the level of transcription. The regulatory region of the IL-2 promoter is capable of mediating high levels of expression even when the helical phasing between transcription factor binding sites is perturbed. Although long considered an enhancer, our studies indicate that the regulatory region in the IL-2 promoter is better considered as a proximal regulatory element, since it lacks multiple properties associated with enhancer elements.

•HMGB1 is a multidomain protein that binds and bends DNA non-sequence specifically.•DNA bending by HMGB1 domains was monitored using single-molecule FRET.•FL HMGB1 bent DNA slightly more than the A box and B box individually.•Deleting the HMGB1 C-terminal tail caused DNA to be bent into a higher FRET state.•Data support the model that the C-terminal tail impedes DNA binding by the B box.High mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) is an architectural protein that facilitates the formation of protein–DNA assemblies involved in transcription, recombination, DNA repair, and chromatin remodeling. Important to its function is the ability of HMGB1 to bend DNA non-sequence specifically. HMGB1 contains two HMG boxes that bind and bend DNA (the A box and the B box) and a C-terminal acidic tail. We investigated how these domains contribute to DNA bending by HMGB1 using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), which enabled us to resolve heterogeneous populations of bent and unbent DNA. We found that full-length (FL) HMGB1 bent DNA more than the individual A and B boxes. Removing the C-terminal tail resulted in a protein that bent DNA to a greater extent than the FL protein. These data suggest that the A and B boxes simultaneously bind DNA in the absence of the C-terminal tail, but the tail modulates DNA binding and bending by one of the HMG boxes in the FL protein. Indeed, a construct composed of the B box and the C-terminal tail only bent DNA at higher protein concentrations. Moreover, in the context of the FL protein, mutating the A box such that it could not bend DNA resulted in a protein that bent DNA similar to a single HMG box and only at higher protein concentrations. We propose a model in which the HMGB1 C-terminal tail serves as an intramolecular damper that modulates the interaction of the B box with DNA.Download high-res image (76KB)Download full-size image

The B2 family of short interspersed elements is transcribed into non-coding RNA by RNA polymerase III. The ~ 180-nt B2 RNA has been shown to potently repress mRNA transcription by binding tightly to RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and assembling with it into complexes on promoter DNA, where it keeps the polymerase from properly engaging the promoter DNA. Mammalian Pol II is an ~ 500-kDa complex that contains 12 different protein subunits, providing many possible surfaces for interaction with B2 RNA. We found that the carboxy-terminal domain of the largest Pol II subunit was not required for B2 RNA to bind Pol II and repress transcription in vitro. To identify the surface on Pol II to which the minimal functional region of B2 RNA binds, we coupled multi-step affinity purification, reversible formaldehyde cross-linking, peptide sequencing by mass spectrometry, and analysis of peptide enrichment. The Pol II peptides most highly recovered after cross-linking to B2 RNA mapped to the DNA binding cleft and active-site region of Pol II. These studies determine the location of a defined nucleic acid binding site on a large, native, multi-subunit complex and provide insight into the mechanism of transcriptional repression by B2 RNA.Download high-res image (210KB)Download full-size imageHighlights► The non-coding B2 RNA potently represses mRNA transcription by binding tightly to mammalian RNA Pol II; however, the precise sites on Pol II to which B2 RNA binds was unknown. ► We used reversible formaldehyde cross-linking coupled to mass spectrometry to identify the Pol II peptides that bind directly to the minimal functional region of B2 RNA. ► A label-free peptide quantitation approach revealed which of the cross-linked peptides were most highly enriched. ► Mapping these peptides onto a crystal structure of yeast Pol II showed that B2 RNA associates with a surface of Pol II containing the DNA binding cleft and active-site region, providing fundamental insight into how B2 RNA represses transcription.

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have recently been discovered to regulate mRNA transcription in trans, a role traditionally reserved for proteins. The breadth of ncRNAs as transacting transcriptional regulators and the diversity of signals to which they respond are only now becoming recognized. Here we show that human Alu RNA, transcribed from short interspersed elements (SINEs), is a transacting transcriptional repressor during the cellular heat shock response. Alu RNA blocks transcription by binding RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and entering complexes at promoters in vitro and in human cells. Transcriptional repression by Alu RNA involves two loosely structured domains that are modular, a property reminiscent of classical protein transcriptional regulators. Two other SINE RNAs, human scAlu RNA and mouse B1 RNA, also bind Pol II but do not repress transcription in vitro. These studies provide an explanation for why mouse cells harbor two major classes of SINEs, whereas human cells contain only one.

Eukaryotic mRNA transcription by RNA polymerase II is a highly regulated complex reaction involving numerous proteins. In order to control tissue and promoter specific gene expression, transcription factors must work in concert with each other and with the promoter DNA to form the proper architecture to activate the gene of interest. The TATA binding protein (TBP) binds to TATA boxes in core promoters and bends the TATA DNA. We have used quantitative solution fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and gel-based FRET (gelFRET) to determine the effect of TFIIA on the conformation of the DNA in TBP/TATA complexes and on the kinetic stability of these complexes. Our results indicate that human TFIIA decreases the angle to which human TBP bends consensus TATA DNA from 104° to 80° when calculated using a two-kink model. The kinetic stability of TBP/TATA complexes was greatly reduced by increasing the KCl concentration from 50 mM to 140 mM, which is more physiologically relevant. TFIIA significantly enhanced the kinetic stability of TBP/TATA complexes, thereby attenuating the effect of higher salt concentrations. We also found that TBP bent non-consensus TATA DNA to a lesser degree than consensus TATA DNA and complexes between TBP and a non-consensus TATA box were kinetically unstable even at 50 mM KCl. Interestingly, TFIIA increased the calculated bend angle and kinetic stability of complexes on a non-consensus TATA box, making them similar to those on a consensus TATA box. Our data show that TFIIA induces a conformational change within the TBP/TATA complex that enhances its stability under both in vitro and physiological salt conditions. Furthermore, we present a refined model for the effect that TFIIA has on DNA conformation that takes into account potential changes in bend angle as well as twist angle.

Transcription of mRNA genes requires that RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and the general transcription factors assemble on promoter DNA to form an organized complex capable of initiating transcription. Biochemical studies have shown that Pol II and TFIID (transcription factor IID) contact overlapping regions of the promoter, leading to the question of how these large factors reconcile their promoter interactions during complex assembly. To investigate how the TAF (TATA-binding protein-associated factor) subunits of TFIID alter the kinetic mechanism by which complexes assemble on promoters, we used a highly purified human transcription system. We found that TAFs sharply decrease the rate at which Pol II, TFIIB, and TFIIF assemble on promoter-bound TFIID–TFIIA. Interestingly, the slow step in this process is not recruitment of these factors to the DNA, but rather a postrecruitment isomerization of protein–DNA contacts that occurs throughout the core promoter. Our findings support a model in which Pol II and the general transcription factors rapidly bind promoter-bound TFIID–TFIIA, after which complexes undergo a slow isomerization in which the TAFs reorganize their contacts with the promoter to allow Pol II to properly engage the DNA. In this manner, TAFs kinetically repress basal transcription.

•Pol II transcription is regulated by ncRNAs.•ncRNAs facilitate DNA looping and transcription factor recruitment.•Promoter-proximal pausing by Pol II is influenced by ncRNAs.•ncRNAs interact with Pol II to activate or inhibit transcription.•Pol II uses its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity to regulate an ncRNA.Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is required to produce mRNAs and some noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) within mammalian cells. This coordinated process is precisely regulated by multiple factors, including many recently discovered ncRNAs. In this perspective, we will discuss newly identified ncRNAs that facilitate DNA looping, regulate transcription factor binding, mediate promoter-proximal pausing of Pol II, and/or interact with Pol II to modulate transcription. Moreover, we will discuss new roles for ncRNAs, as well as a novel Pol II RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity that regulates an ncRNA inhibitor of transcription. As the multifaceted nature of ncRNAs continues to be revealed, we believe that many more ncRNA species and functions will be discovered.Graphical AbstractDownload high-res image (130KB)Download full-size image

•Pol II transcription is regulated by ncRNAs.•ncRNAs facilitate DNA looping and transcription factor recruitment.•Promoter-proximal pausing by Pol II is influenced by ncRNAs.•ncRNAs interact with Pol II to activate or inhibit transcription.•Pol II uses its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity to regulate an ncRNA.Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is required to produce mRNAs and some noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) within mammalian cells. This coordinated process is precisely regulated by multiple factors, including many recently discovered ncRNAs. In this perspective, we will discuss newly identified ncRNAs that facilitate DNA looping, regulate transcription factor binding, mediate promoter-proximal pausing of Pol II, and/or interact with Pol II to modulate transcription. Moreover, we will discuss new roles for ncRNAs, as well as a novel Pol II RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity that regulates an ncRNA inhibitor of transcription. As the multifaceted nature of ncRNAs continues to be revealed, we believe that many more ncRNA species and functions will be discovered.Graphical AbstractDownload high-res image (130KB)Download full-size image