Co-reporter:Li Wang, Linling Wang, Zhu Miao, Xiumei Shao, Jing Chen and Xiaohua Lu
Analytical Methods 2012 vol. 4(Issue 3) pp:844-848
Publication Date(Web):02 Feb 2012
DOI:10.1039/C2AY05715H
Two environmentally friendly sample preparation methods, subcritical water extraction (SWE) and microwave-assisted water extraction (MAWE) coupled to the gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC-ECD), were evaluated and optimized for the sensitive, selective and solvent-free determination of four chlorophenols (2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 4-chlorophenol and pentachlorophenol) in polluted Ya-Er Lake sediments. An orthogonal array design L9 (33) was applied to select the optimum conditions for SWE. The best results as regards sensitivity, repeatability and analyte recovery were obtained using SWE with 9 mL of sodium hydroxide solution (pH 9), at 150 °C for 80 min. The best extraction conditions for MAWE were obtained by using the same extractant as SWE at 900 W and 0.2 MPa for 6 min. Under final working conditions, satisfactory recoveries of individual chlorophenols (CPs) were obtained in the range of 77.7–113.0% and 83.5–104.7% for SWE and MAWE respectively. The effectiveness of the extraction conditions proposed in both methods was evaluated for the extraction of 2,4-DCP in lake sediments with different sample characteristics such as organic carbon and water content. The results indicated that sediments containing relatively low amounts of organic carbon can be quantitatively extracted by both extraction methods. For sediments with larger amounts of organic carbon, the MAWE-based method showed a little better result for analyte recovery than SWE.
Co-reporter:Yu Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Xiaohua Lu, Jinquan Yang, Kangbing Wu
Food Chemistry 2010 Volume 122(Issue 3) pp:909-913
Publication Date(Web):1 October 2010
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.035
The monitoring of synthetic colourants in foods is very important due to their potential toxicity and pathogenicity. Herein, an electrochemical sensor for rapid and simple detection of Ponceau 4R and Allura Red was constructed using multi-wall carbon nanotube (MWNT) sensing film. In pH 7.0 phosphate buffer, two oxidation peaks are observed at 0.56 and 0.68 V for Ponceau 4R and Allura Red. Because of its large surface area and high accumulation efficiency, the MWNT film sensor remarkably enhances the oxidation signals of Ponceau 4R and Allura Red. The detection parameters such as pH value, amount of MWNT, accumulation potential and time were optimised. The MWNT film sensor possesses high sensitivity to Ponceau 4R and Allura Red, and the limits of detection are as low as 15 and 25 μg L−1. Finally, the MWNT sensor was successfully used to detect Ponceau 4R and Allura Red in different soft drinks.
Co-reporter:
Analytical Methods (2009-Present) 2012 - vol. 4(Issue 3) pp:
Publication Date(Web):
DOI:10.1039/C2AY05715H
Two environmentally friendly sample preparation methods, subcritical water extraction (SWE) and microwave-assisted water extraction (MAWE) coupled to the gas chromatography with electron capture detector (GC-ECD), were evaluated and optimized for the sensitive, selective and solvent-free determination of four chlorophenols (2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 4-chlorophenol and pentachlorophenol) in polluted Ya-Er Lake sediments. An orthogonal array design L9 (33) was applied to select the optimum conditions for SWE. The best results as regards sensitivity, repeatability and analyte recovery were obtained using SWE with 9 mL of sodium hydroxide solution (pH 9), at 150 °C for 80 min. The best extraction conditions for MAWE were obtained by using the same extractant as SWE at 900 W and 0.2 MPa for 6 min. Under final working conditions, satisfactory recoveries of individual chlorophenols (CPs) were obtained in the range of 77.7–113.0% and 83.5–104.7% for SWE and MAWE respectively. The effectiveness of the extraction conditions proposed in both methods was evaluated for the extraction of 2,4-DCP in lake sediments with different sample characteristics such as organic carbon and water content. The results indicated that sediments containing relatively low amounts of organic carbon can be quantitatively extracted by both extraction methods. For sediments with larger amounts of organic carbon, the MAWE-based method showed a little better result for analyte recovery than SWE.