Co-reporter:Shun-ichi Sekine, Yuko Murayama, Vladimir Svetlov, Evgeny Nudler, Shigeyuki Yokoyama
Molecular Cell (5 February 2015) Volume 57(Issue 3) pp:408-421
Publication Date(Web):5 February 2015
DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.014
•RNA polymerase can assume the tight and ratcheted forms (T and R)•The R form is for GreA-dependent RNA cleavage, arrest, and hairpin-pause/termination•The T form is for GreA-independent RNA cleavage, nucleotide addition, and its reversal•The paused/backtracked T form readily transitions to the R form, governed by RNADNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) accomplishes multiple tasks during transcription by assuming different structural forms. Reportedly, the “tight” form performs nucleotide addition to nascent RNA, while the “ratcheted” form is adopted for transcription inhibition. In this study, we performed Cys-pair crosslinking (CPX) analyses of various transcription complexes of a bacterial RNAP and crystallographic analyses of its backtracked and Gre-factor-bound states to clarify which of the two forms is adopted. The ratcheted form was revealed to support GreA-dependent transcript cleavage, long backtracking, hairpin-dependent pausing, and termination. In contrast, the tight form correlated with nucleotide addition, mismatch-dependent pausing, one-nucleotide backtracking, and factor-independent transcript cleavage. RNAP in the paused/backtracked state, but not the nucleotide-addition state, readily transitions to the ratcheted form (“ratchetable”), indicating that the tight form represents two distinct regulatory states. The 3′ end and the hairpin structure of the nascent RNA promote the ratchetable nature by modulating the trigger-loop conformation.Download high-res image (614KB)Download full-size image